channels

()Robert says. "omgblog thank you thank you thank..."[] ()Rodders says. "Do these people live in caves? When..."[] ()mike Rivera says. "can someone explain to me whats hap..."[] ()Chris says. "She's more coherent than most of my..."[] Prof. Michael Cobb explains how the gays are giving religious haters a taste of their own medicine Aussie superstar Kylie Minogue (pictured above at right) has gone edgier in the promo photos for her new album "X," donning latex clothes and sporting a pained expression. I'm not sure if it's her face pose or outfit but in the above photo. Kylie looks eerily similar to New York downtown fixture and fashion icon Sophia Lamar (pictured above at left) and that is always a good thing! I'm looking forward to the new album but also nervous especially after the as I really want "X" to be as stellar as "Body Language" and "Fever." In bowling if Kylie pulled that off we would call it a turkey. See some more promo photos after the jump. Didn't Madonna do that already (YAWN) and i'm a melbourne guy ( the Home of Kylie ) but come on how about some originality ?????? (If you don't sign in with Typekey your comment will be held for approval. I approve anything that is not spam.) Disclaimer: What you read here may or may not be true. I do not claim credit for any images except where noted. Please if I use your image and you would like it removed.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.omgblog.com/2007/11/kylie_channels_sophia.php

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Posted in by Julian Clover on November 13th. 2007. 11:44 am PrimeTel has added four new packages from Nova Cyprus to its IPTV platform. The package adds the premium channel Supersport as well as Sigma Sports and Motors TV. In total the alliance with Nova adds a be of 11 sports channels to the Primetel platform. Primetel subscribers will also be able to enjoy another four movie channels: FilmNet 1. FilmNet 2. FilmNet3 and MGM. The Nova Cyprus packages. Sports or Cinema can be added to Primetel’s 32-channel Value Pack. Alternative subscribers can choose the complete array of channels through the top tier Full Pack.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.broadbandtvnews.com/today/?p=2692

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Donald Kerr the US Principal Deputy Director of Intelligence has decided to kill privacy. He says that human beings can no longer evaluate governments and companies not to spy on them; instead "privacy" ordain now mean having the right to expect that governments and companies won't tell other people what they hit the books when they spy on you. Privacy no longer can mean anonymity says Donald Kerr the principal deputy director of national intelligence. Instead it should mean that government and businesses properly safeguard populate's private communications and financial information... He noted that government employees approach up to five years in prison and $100,000 in fines if convicted of misusing private information. "Instead it should convey that government and businesses properly safeguard people's private communications and financial information..." And when exactly did they plan to get exceed at doing this? They've already proven to be poor or purely deceptive handlers either with their own or everyone else's information. On the topic of Orwell how about flooding their lie office with the book. Maybe someone of some function will take it home and read it. :P Creeps desire Ministry of Information Director Kerr ordain see to it that legal uses ordain include anything they see fit to do. "Kerr said at an October intelligence conference in San Antonio that he finds concerns that the government may be listening in odd when people are ``perfectly willing for a green-card holder at an (Internet function provider) who may or may have not have been an illegal entrant to the United States to command their data.''" Yeah what's the matter with people? They trust some Johnny Foreigner to work at an ISP but don't want the US Government recording all their telecommunicate? How odd. One of the things that I usually dislike about "discussion sites" is that eventually it's an emit chamber. And this is no exception. The only challenge is at what inform do we end to make this forbid? And what do we do to stop this? And at what point do we decide that it's not worth it to stop this and move elsewhere where the concepts of "privacy". "freedom" and "torture" are not trivial things to be redefined at the whims of the Assistant Assistant Undersecretary of Naval Gazing? And it's the biggest problem with the US. I evaluate. As South lay pointed out we "say one thing and do another." We all say--and believe--that a lot of what is going on is rotten but we don't do anything to forbid it. But what do you do to stop it? The country spoke loud and alter in the last congressional election sweeping the Republicans out of office and replacing them with Democrats who we thought were going to bring the pain and serve the comeuppance. But what did they do? We are sitting here where any idiot lawyer in the country could put together a rock-solid case for impeaching the president vice president and former secretary of defense yet all the populate we choose into offices where they can do that can't seem to get their acts together enough to actually do it. So what do you do when the checks and balances and popular oversight--no be how weak to mouth with--have been thoroughly compromised? come up we happen to have an amendment to the Constitution that was penned to communicate just such an eventuality but at some point it became illegal (in violation of the spirit and letter of the first amendment. I might add) to change surface address it and more ridiculously most of the populate most disturb by the way the government is going also undergo a stupid and irrational fear of that amendment and the subject about which it is written. You can't oust a totalitarian regime with hippie wet and love beads. You can't levitate the problem away with focused telepathic peace beams. And the policeman's gun still fires no matter how many flowers you shove into it. But since it's easier to go and bang drums and strum guitars than it is to actually understand problems as carve as these we opt for the former. Yes what do we do about this? Hmmm.. the culture war this last decade has obfuscated everything and no one will give a egest until an economic change. Then suddenly its measure to actually fight for freedom. Personally. I'm all for experimenting with an recognise system type of account of Rights. It's not like there's historical examples were governments wiped their asses with there esteemed social contracts. "You can't remove a totalitarian regime with hippie water and love beads. You can't bring up the problem away with focused telepathic peace beams. And the policeman's gun still fires no matter how many flowers you shove into it. But since it's easier to whine and hit drums and strum guitars than it is to actually solve problems as carve as these we opt for the former." Although quite dramatic. I undergo to be with the general idea of what Kyle is saying. You can indeed depose governments of every kind through what you seem to believe as useless activity. Think about it-- nobody had a revolution to blackball every typewriter in the US people just drifted away from using them as better options became known. For those of us who know of or can envision such better options for government we can be leaders by living as if such a government existed right now-- it's leading by example. A society is defined more so in the relationship between the individual and the society. Here a decision has been made that the government is more important than the individual. Clearly since the mechanisms of cater reside in the hands of the state this is an imbalance that potentially bodes ill for American society if there is no balance to the free rein given to government. What happens when one day the populate that use the snooping end that they will use this to compel their idea of government alter or do by? We have already seen some of this in the actions of the NYC Police Department and how they aggressively collected information on people who attempted to legitimately exercise their rights as citizens in voicing their opinions before during and after the last Republican National Convention and it is not just that there was a convention going on either. "Kerr said at an October intelligence conference in San Antonio that he finds concerns that the government may be listening in odd when populate are ``perfectly willing for a green-card holder at an (Internet function provider) who may or may undergo not have been an illegal entrant to the United States to handle their data.''" Yes it's called outsourcing; my tech support calls go to Belfast and Bangalore and I don't evaluate that his regime will change anything. The only hope we have of change is when populate realize that privacy =/= being able to watch porn at home. "Kerr said at an October intelligence conference in San Antonio that he finds concerns that the government may be listening in odd when populate are ``perfectly willing for a green-card holder at an (Internet service provider) who may or may undergo not have been an illegal entrant to the United States to handle their data.''" That's so idiotic. A color separate is the final step before naturalization at which inform the person could get a job with US intelligence. If we can't believe Green separate holders what makes Kerr think we can trust citizens? I find the naivete of anyone surprised by this very quaint and charming and the statement itself refreshingly honest. What the hell did you evaluate nations' intelligence services were for in the first displace? Constitutional.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://feeds.boingboing.net/~r/boingboing/iBag/~3/183405784/us-intelligence-honc.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Last Thursday. I discussed filed by NACDS and NCPA against CMS. I speculated that an injunction was unlikely using the standards outlined in another case and my knowledge of the 1980s TV show L. A. Law. Well worry not legal mavens. Jayne Juvan of Juvan’s Health Law Update has now provided a genuine legal analysis of this case in. While Jayne is coy about predicting the ultimate outcome. I’ll be bolder and/or more foolish. I guess that this legal challenge will disappoint and CMS will not be enjoined by the act from implementing its on AMP. You may not desire my conclusion but it seems consistent with the objective facts and standards of judgment that will be applied. Legal StandardsJayne has been noticeably absent from the blogosphere in the past few months so it’s very good to have her approve. She took time off from blogging for some silly cerebrate like “working for pay.” Ha! Doesn’t she know what a blog is all about?Anyway. Jayne reviews the specific legal precedents of the D. C. Circuit Court which is where NACDS and NCPA are suing CMS. Although she is careful not to give a formal legal conclusion. Jayne notes that standard applied by the D. C. go is actually quite similar to the standard from the back up Circuit that I discussed on Thursday. (Thanks. Corbin!)She points out that the inspect will likely be on whether the injure of implementing the Final command is -- “impossible to repair rectify or amend.” Jayne quotes the D. C. Circuit as saying: “Mere injuries however substantial in terms of money measure and energy necessarily expended in the absence of a stay are not enough.”Evaluating Irreparable HarmIn re-reading the. I see very little discussion of irreparable harm by the plaintiffs. The complaint highlights the potential force of AMP for retail pharmacies such as: The first two items do not seem irreparable to me. Pharmacies could always increase their hours at some future go out. Pharmacies may choose to forbid participating in Medicaid but CMS’ federal Final Rule does not legally “force” anyone out of a state-run Medicaid schedule. The third affirm has more theoretical be but continues the unfortunate tradition of exaggerating the financial force of AMP. It also does not seem to exceed the “mere injuries” standard highlighted above. The complaint notes CMS’ calculate of $8 billion in reduced reimbursement over five years. Given the growth in pharmacy spending the real reduction in pharmacy revenues from AMP is estimated to be 0.5% in 2008. For the typical independent with $2.5 million in revenues that translates into $12,500 less revenue per year ($2.5M*0.5%) or about $1,000 per month. That's not good news and will certainly require some belt tightening. But it's hardly the difference between bankruptcy and easy street in 2008. Just to be alter. I undergo written very sympathetically about. But AMP is not the only cause of the challenges facing independents. Please construe and before sending me hate mail. Thus. I believe the injunction will fail because the act will realize that there is little actual irreparable harm. I suspect the act will also cerebrate that we’ll have the opportunity in 2008 to evaluate the actual non-hypothetical effects of this legislation (pro and con).---Reminder: construe the disclaimer below. And never forget that free advice from a communicate might be worth what you paid for it. What do you think of the arguments that pharmacies make? Their arguments are based on the statute which says that AMP = prices paid by wholesalers for drugs distributed to the retail pharmacy class of change. According the complaint the AMP command violates this statute because it includes in AMP calculations things like sales to physicians sales to dialysis centers sales to hospital outpatient facilities sales to patients etc. etc. Are they right? Defining "retail" class of trade" has always been the key flash inform for AMP. I am not going to mention on the legal arguments here. Instead. I suggest you construe. The key air is boiled down in carve up 25 of his report which states:"CMS has re-defined the call “retail pharmacy class of change” to encompass virtually all pharmacies and providers who give or care drugs to the end consumer. This re-definition stands in stark contrast to the use of the term “retail pharmacy class of change” in the pharmaceutical market."Adam Adam J. Fein. Ph. D is the founder and president of Philadelphia-based Pembroke Consulting. Inc. Dr. Fein consults with pharmaceutical manufacturers on channel strategy advises technology companies on marketing to the life sciences industry serves as an expert witness and legal consultant on selected cases involving pharmaceutical distribution and delivers presentations about the pharmaceutical industry to executives around the world. Dr. Fein also conducts economic research on wholesale distribution with particular emphasis on the pharmaceutical industry. Dr. Fein earned his Ph. D from the Wharton educate of Business and a B. A. summa cum laude from Brandeis University. He lives in Philadelphia with his wife and their two children. The analyses on this website are based on information and data that is in the public domain. Any conclusions findings opinions or recommendations are based on our own experienced and professional judgment and interpretations given the information available. While all information is believed to be reliable at the measure of writing the information provided here is for reference use only and does not constitute the rendering of legal financial commercial or other professional advice by Pembroke Consulting. Inc or the compose. Any reliance upon the information is at your own risk and Pembroke Consulting. Inc and the author shall not be responsible for any liability arising from or related to the use or accuracy of the information in any way. Pembroke Consulting. Inc does not alter investment recommendations on this website or otherwise. Nothing on this website should be interpreted as an opinion by Pembroke Consulting. Inc or the author on the prospects of specific companies. Copyright 2006-2007 Pembroke Consulting. Inc. All rights reserved.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.drugchannels.net/2007/11/analysis-of-amp-lawsuit-odds.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

I hear many owe and real estate professionals within the industry still spouting off about how no technology ordain ever regenerate them…no technology won’t but the professional that leverages technology properly clients. If you evaluate about it a bad service provider with good SEO is dangerous it’s very indiscriminate in this way… Proper is where it’s at for the future of real estate and mortgage marketing and ordain coat the way for future compensation reformation. Real estate and mortgage professionals should stay away from technology providers who are in the business of selling you ‘SEO solutions’. Chances are they have no idea WTF real estate and/or mortgage is about and are solely in the biz to make money off of your ignorance. They’re the type to buy a house on emotion try and get you to commit fraud in the process get it financed any way they can then blame you for paying too much and having an effective interest evaluate in the 14% range. These are the same populate who will express you although sites with of 7 and higher routinely undergo domiciliate pages with hundreds of links on them. SEO is getting to the inform of ‘fire and forget’ and is getting easier for the laymen to implement…here check. I’ll show: I’m currently working on a few initiatives for the mortgage and real estate industries one of them is called RateSpeed. If you’re a regular reader of The XBroker you have heard me communicate of this ‘drive’ before (many delays with many reasons that really don’t be at this inform). RateSpeed has absolutely nothing to do with SEO it’s all about SNO. For those who haven’t heard of RateSpeed real quick…It’s akin to a ‘color box’ that aggregates a mortgage professionals wholesale lender arouse rate pricing feeds organizes and redisplays them according to beat case results dependent on the consumer end-users credit and financial assay data. Mortgage professionals will undergo no ability to manipulate the data between the sell lender and the consumer using the application and MUST tell up front a flat fee (of their discretion) for services…These are the issues at the core of the problem to today’s owe mess. IMHO. RateSpeed displays raw evaluate pricing showing the exact YSP down to the $.01 and how it can be applied to closing costs if that is the It’s also happens to be a an efficiency and bring about generation tool for mortgage pro’s willing to embrace transparent philosophies. RateSpeeds ability to auto-price and sort through the myriad of lenders they’re approved with stands to save a owe pro’s inordinate amounts of time and related cost. RateSpeed at it’s core stands to alter how mortgages are sold through compensation reformation. By showing consumers exactly how owe professionals alter money reform will (is) be(ing) demanded evidenced by. ( I experience many mortgage professionals who practice this level of transparency in their day to day business but there are too many who don’t and they’ve screwed it up for the rest of us. Some ordain say it’s too confusing to the consumer others just want to act the practice of personally enriching themselves through consumer ignorance. Anyway how RateSpeed specifically works isn’t what this post is about so I’ll act on. Real estate professionals can also embed RateSpeed on their sites because it ordain (must) be directly connected to their selected (and approved) mortgage pro(s) who are ‘in the network’. From a Social Networking aspect it will bring together together hubs of desire real estate agents and owe professionals who appreciate learn and preach a common open philosophy when it comes to providing owe services. To act it a go further. RateSpeed will have the ability to permeate existing social networks like LinkedIn and FaceBook (if think you are reading between the lines here you are). After reading piece measure year and (at about the same time) engaging in a mile desire comment thread on Redfin com(s) former ‘Wall of compel’ category that involved the ethereal term ‘Procuring create’. I was drawn to Greg Swann’s perspective on the issue of. It is voluminous the most comprehensive resource and reasoning of it’s kind. I’d be lying if I said I construe it all though I’ve been a proponent of much of the circumscribe within the diatribes I’ve speed construe. What’s most compelling about the topic for me is two-fold is tirelessly arguing for it…a practicing real estate professional and B. The argument is synonymous to calling for the end of the MLS as it still stands today a dinosaur of a database that was meant to pledge inter-broker compensation. Compensation reformation or divorcing real estate commissions is coming since inter-broker compensation can be handled outside of the traditional MLS (as Greg and company tirelessly furnish). There have been a plethora (more than I care to cerebrate to) of proposed solutions albeit most of them still demand prohibitive adoption methods and maintain confinement to and within a defined box. A different version of the same thing isn’t a viable solution and crowd adoption of isn’t probable considering the openness of the technology landscape. 2007-08 send. and aren’t it either nor are their widgets. Why would an agent want to feature an application on their website that leads a potential client away from their website? Both well funded 3rd celebrate destination real estate information websites business models turn around advertising. Advertisers pay money to players like Z & T because consumers are carousing their sites not an agents or brokerage so it would be fair to say that both entities would like to keep the consumer This isn’t a strike against either company they do what they do and make no bones about it however their respective agendas don’t lie up with the individual agent. Both company’s (I can hear David G coming now) will keep that they exist to alter the consumer undergo and displace visitors (approve) to the individual professionals. This may bring home the bacon in theory but in the end both are pretty much destined to become Phone Book 2.0…which is fine. An application (technology widget et al.) that allows for a real estate professional to ’share’ their valuable information and merchandise their services to others within similar spheres while insuring an acceptable assurance of reciprocity has yet to be identified…though it should involve a strategy that implements an open Social Networking Optimization framework that allows birds of a conjoin to go and fly together… A blog-site service provider who has a proven packaged solution for real estate and mortgage professionals…instead of going it alone from adjoin… Blog-site…There has to be a better call/name for what these ‘evolved websites’ really are and can do. The term blog almost has a neg stigma to it…kinda like canned ;) WOW what’s next for RateSpeed; world hunger? ;-) I evaluate RateSpeed’s a cool concept but positioning it against using RE media properties is a real be. This idea of “keeping consumers” on site is a non-issue; all real estate transactions are consummated off-line (without the.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.thexbroker.com/?p=315

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

accused MSNBC of going “left” because they dared to furnish Rosie O’Donnell a job. He picks up on a theme that account O’Reilly promotes daily because he’s disturb at Keith Olbermann for calling him out on his inaccuracies and refuses to name him. This is nothing new for Howard. He hasn’t open a alter wing talking inform that he doesn’t embrace. Here’s Howie: KURTZ: Let me show you a little bit on this question that kind of sparked a consider about whether or not MSNBC is moving to the left. Let me show you a little bit of what you get in prime-time MSNBC followed by Rosie O’Donnell on her communicate a video of her talking about the deal that cut apart. Who has started a consider about this. Howard? Only Bill O’Reilly and the Malkinites. If a Presidency has started an immoral war illegally spied on Americans incorporated anguish as national policy (and many more atrocities against the Constitution)—why does it make MSNBC a lefty for pointing “facts” out that are NEWS instead of spinning it? Thankfully of Women in Media and News was on. She had to set him straight on this idiocy and actually Howie cut her off (just desire BillO) because she destroyed his talking inform. Watch him argue Morning Joe because he’s a Republican and should undergo opinions but seems to undergo forgotten that Phil Donohue got FIRED for being against the Iraq invasion. POZNER: You experience what? I have to say having done commentary on FOX News a be of times and having done Joe Scarborough’s show on MSNBC. I’ve always had a tougher measure from Scarborough. He struck me as the single-most conservative entertain of any show I’ve ever done and I’ve been on “O’Reilly” and I’ve been on “Hannity & Colmes.” KURTZ: But what’s do by with that. It’s Scarborough’s… POZNER: Yes. But when I’m saying is it’s disingenuous to say MSNBC is tilting left when the majority of the people who entertain shows on MSNBC are either centrists or conservative. Olbermann is a liberal entertain but he doesn’t necessarily back up liberal candidates or back up liberal projects. The one hit show that was hosted by an actual person who called himself a leftist and had liberal and progressive guests and such was Phil Donahue’s show and it was cancelled in the run-up to the Iraq war… POZNER: … because they said from a memo from the top down they didn’t want to give an antiwar face for MSNBC. KURTZ: I think the argument that I’ve heard Olbermann make in the past about Fox News — it’s not an argument that I embrace — is that because it poses as a news organization and puts out dangerous misinformation – KURTZ: – and is — is a cheerleader for the furnish administration that it’s misinforming our society. But you know what? Howard you ignorant slut! They are not entitled to do it if they be to be considered a f*&King news organization. What planet are you living on? gratify just forbid masquerading as a media critic. You’re entitled to your opinions also but get honest. Of course what’s really interesting in all of this is that these anchors mention on “moving left” as if it were some kind of crime. Judging from what we’ve seen of the current right wing administration. Americans should go away to cognise that it’s the alter that’s criminally inclined. Kurtz might be the most bland personality on news-type shows today. He’s got to do something to distinguish himself and being an also-ran Bill-O seems to be the most his milquetoast object can creatively conjure. Poor Howard you really are a boring putz. …and by the way the measure measure I checked saying Fox News is entitled to be “a cheerleader for the furnish administration” while at the same time making up a “debate” about MSNBC tilting left is pretty much the encyclopedia definition of double standard. When is the public finally going to cognise this and just move off the TV? Because really that’s the only way we’re going to get these idiots off the airwaves. Ditto to what kaT said in comment #2. Is it a sin or a crime to undergo a different inform of view than the bush ass kissers? I experience they wish it were but it isn’t yet. On the left we have Keith. That’s it. Wouldn’t it be fair and balanced to accept us a couple more? This idiot talks out of both sides of his mouth. On one transfer he says it “gives [him] pause” to see MSNBC moving left (as he sees it) but he thinks Conservatives are “supposed to be opinionated.” I guess it’s only a bad thing when it’s Liberals. When even Michael Medved disagrees with you you know you’ve gone over the cliff. They have host like BillO. Tucker. Beck and most of the measure Chris Matthews and now Morning Joe. Seems a little weighted to the alter on telecommunicate talk shows to me. Tucker and Mathews are on MSNBC. So if the repubs can have two why can’t we? Personally I wouldn’t care to check Rosie but there are a lot of others I sure would like to see. Rachael being number 1. I did hear that alter. What a sorry goof is Howard Kurtz. Just brimming with ideas of journalistic integrity. CNN is not center nor rightwing it’s done went it over the edge putting on this guy and Beck and alter and the other wingnut crazies. egest. This idiot [Kurtz] is all over the place pimping his book and his co-conspirators in the media are welcoming him in this assay. Slightly OT: yesterday I was listening to CNN [trapped in an airport waiting dwell; no choice; better than FOX] and some news-reader was interviewing some guy [Gen. Honore] who’d served in the National follow after Katrina and some other places. The news-reader said something about “opponents of the war protesting at vets’ funerals,” “attacking vets when they came domiciliate,” and then he & the command moaned about people “not separating their political beliefs yada yada.” I wanted to throw something at the tv and mouth “the folks protesting at vets’ funerals are the right-wing anti-gay idiots[Rev. Phelps] you nimrod!!!” It’s infuriating that they get away with this ignorance & propaganda. Crap. This idiot [Kurtz] is all over the place pimping his book and his co-conspirators in the media are welcoming him in this endeavor. Slightly OT: yesterday I was listening to CNN [trapped in an airport waiting dwell; no choice; exceed than FOX] and some news-reader was interviewing some guy [Gen. Honore] who’d served in the National Guard after Katrina and some other places. The news-reader said something about “opponents of the war protesting at vets’ funerals,” “attacking vets when they came home,” and then he & the command moaned about populate “not separating their political beliefs yada yada.” I wanted to throw something at the tv and shout “the folks protesting at vets’ funerals are the right-wing anti-gay idiots[Rev. Phelps] you nimrod!!!” It’s infuriating that they get away with this ignorance & propaganda. What I experience FOR SURE IS THAT. HARDBALL AND TIM RUSSETT be TO BE MOVED TO THE FOX go bring AND PLACED IN BETWEEN HANNITY AND O’RILEY. GEEZ HARDBALL IS AN HOUR desire race FOR BARAQ.

The study - which the said is a road map for best practices and trends in channel integration within the catalog retail and e-commerce infrastructures - open that successful multichannel marketers undergo consistent and integrated standards across all channels according to the DMA. "Consumers evaluate - in whatever channel they opt to use - to interact with one affiliate with integrated systems that are transparent to that consumer. After all the different channels feed off of each other - a consumer looking at a mail-order catalog for example may order online. So the marketer's channels must all be consistent," said Anna Chernis. DMA's senior investigate manager. "This view is a study departure from earlier thinking in which companies thought the internet bring would require different pricing promotions and other approaches than the other channels."

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.marketingvox.com/archives/2007/09/13/multichannel-marketers-integrating-channels-70-percent-report-increased-sales/?rss1

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam